Report to the

Faculty, Administration, Trustees, Students

of

Quinebaug Valley Community College

Danielson, Connecticut

 

by

 

An Evaluation Team representing the

Commission on Institutions of Higher Education

of the

New England Association of Schools and Colleges

 

Prepared after study of the institution’s

self-evaluation report and a visit to

the campus October 28-31, 2001

 

| Introduction | Standard One - Mission & Purposes | Standard Two - Planning & Evaluation |
| Standard Three - Organization & Governance | Standard Four - Programs & Instructions |
| Standard Five - Faculty | Standard Six - Student Services | Standard Seven - Library & Information Resources |
| Standard Eight - Physical Resources | Standard Nine - Financial Resources | Standard Ten - Public Disclosure |
| Standard Eleven - Integrity |

 

The members of the team:

 

Dr. Jack Barocas, Dean of Math, Science & Engineering Transfer, Springfield Technical Community College, Springfield, MA

 

Ms. Judith Campbell, Director of Learning Resources, Holyoke Community College, Holyoke, MA

 

Ms. Cheryl A. Dorfman, Assistant Dean of Academic Affairs, Berkshire Community College, Pittsfield, MA

 

Dr. Richard A. Hillier, Dean of Administrative Services, Greenfield Community College, Greenfield, MA

 

Dr. Paul E. Raverta, Vice President for Student Development, Holyoke Community College, Holyoke, MA 01040

 

Dr. Kathleen Schatzberg, President, Cape Cod Community College, West Barnstable, MA

Chairperson

 

Working with the Team:          Dr. John Walters, Connecticut Department of Higher Education, Hartford, CT

 

This report represents the views of the evaluation team as interpreted by the Chairperson; it goes directly to the institution before being considered by the Commission.  It is a confidential document prepared as an educational service for the benefit of the institution.  All comments in the report are made in good faith, in an effort to assist Quinebaug Valley Community College.  They are based solely on an educational evaluation of the institution, and of the manner in which it appears to be carrying out its educational objectives.

 

 

 
Quinebaug Valley Community College

 

Visiting Team Report – October 31, 2001

 

 

Introduction
| top of page |

 

Quinebaug Valley Community College (QVCC) is one of the smallest of the 12 community colleges in Connecticut.  Located in northeastern Connecticut, it serves a rural area with high levels of unemployment, low levels of educational attainment, and an inadequate public transportation system.  To provide greater access, the College delivers programs from both its main campus in Danielson and a branch campus in Willimantic.  In recent years, the College has experienced substantial increases in enrollment, evidence of the great need for its programs and services in this part of Connecticut.

 

The New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC), and specifically its Commission on Institutions of Higher Education (CIHE), assigned a Visiting Team of community college professionals to review QVCC’s Self-Study Report and related institutional documents, and then to visit the College in order to ascertain the degree to which QVCC’s self-report reflected actual practice and conditions at the College, and to determine whether the institution is meeting each of CIHE’s eleven standards for accreditation.  This report reflects the work of that team, whose members were: 

 

·        Dr. Kathleen Schatzberg, Chair of the Visiting Team and

President, Cape Cod Community College

·        Dr. Jack Barocas, Dean of Math, Science and Engineering Transfer,

Springfield Technical Community College

·        Ms. Judith Campbell, Dean of Library Services,

Holyoke Community College

·        Ms. Cheryl A. Dorfman, Assistant Dean of Academic Affairs,

Berkshire Community College

·        Dr. Richard A. Hillier, Dean of Administrative Services,

Greenfield Community College

·        Dr. Paul Raverta, Vice President for Student Services,

Holyoke Community College

 

In addition, serving as an observer was Dr. John Walters, Senior Associate for Evaluation and Planning for the Board of Governors of the Connecticut State Department of Higher Education.  Dr. Walters also provided assistance to the team with information on the organization of Connecticut higher education systems.

 

Because of QVCC’s small size, the visiting team was able to visit, individually or in groups, with the vast majority of faculty, administrators and staff, as well as with substantial numbers of students, members of the community, the community college system chancellor, and a member of the community college system’s Board of Trustees.  What emerged was a picture of a collegial culture that emphasizes teamwork, cross-functionality, ongoing self-assessment and continuous quality improvement.  Repeatedly, the visiting team heard two phrases:  “Every voice counts” and “Learners First.”  The former reflects the active participation of every member of the staff in shaping the goals and activities of the institution, while the latter is Quinebaug’s fundamental institutional philosophy, from which flows all decisions.

 

The community members with whom the Visiting Team met (including more than a dozen legislators and local leaders from business and other sectors) reflected in overwhelmingly positive terms the central role the College plays in the life of its region.  In great detail, they outlined the ways in which the College provides higher education access, serves as a cultural center in the region, and reaches out to its community whenever education or training needs become apparent.   QVCC is “the hub of the wheel,” they said.  It is notable that all three legislators and many of the other leaders at this meeting had taken classes at or graduated from QVCC.

 

The Visiting Team found that Quinebaug Valley Community College’s Self-Study was well written, thoroughly forthcoming, and accurately reflective of the institution’s current status.  The Visiting Team also found that Quinebaug Valley Community College substantially meets all eleven standards for accreditation established by NEASC’s Commission on Institutions of Higher Education.  What follows is descriptive detail, strengths observed, concerns and in some cases, advice for each of the eleven standards. 

 

 

 

Standard One

 

Mission and Purposes
| top of page |

 

The mission of the institution is stated broadly in the mission statement of Connecticut’s Community Technical College System.  Reflecting the needs of QVCC’s region and the resulting activities of the college more specifically is its “Role and Scope Statement” which is approved by both the Board of Trustees of the Community-Technical Colleges of Connecticut and the Connecticut Board of Governors for Higher Education.  The mission and purposes of the QVCC are reflected in its Vision Statement, which is displayed prominently in the college catalog and in various places on the campuses:

 

QVCC will be a center for intellectual and cultural enrichment that serves as a source of pride for our students and the community.

 

By providing high quality, and continuing education in a learner-centered environment, the College will foster accomplished, well-rounded, employable graduates and lifelong learners.

 

The College will be an active partner with the community in local economic, social and cultural development. 

 

QVCC pledges to reaffirm and revitalize its vision through continual self-examination, purposeful change, and innovation.

 

These three source documents reflect a mission that is appropriate to higher education and complies with the operating authorities of the Board of Trustees of the Community-Technical Colleges of Connecticut and the Connecticut Board of Governors for Higher Education.  The manner in which the mission of QVCC is disseminated and used complies with Standard One of the Commission on Institutions of Higher Education.   

 

Strengths

 

  1. The mission, as reflected in the Vision Statement, is understood, embraced and practiced by the entire college community.

 

  1. This Vision is set forth clearly in a variety of published documents, including the website.

 

  1. The institution periodically re-evaluates its mission and uses it to plan, allocate resources, and achieve institutional purposes.

 

Concern

 

  • Greater awareness and use of the “Role and Scope” statement and the system mission are needed.

 

Advice

 

  • The College should consider how it can collect evidence that graduates are “accomplished, well-rounded, employable, and lifelong learners,” or consider modifying the Vision Statement to reflect a demonstrable goal.

 

 

 

Standard Two

 

Planning and Evaluation
| top of page |

 

QVCC undertakes planning and evaluation consistent with its mission and purpose.  All planning and evaluation operate under the guiding principle of “Learners First.”  This principle was adopted by the college in 1997 and exemplifies a shift in focus from a teaching centered focus to a student-centered focus.  In addition, QVCC places planning and evaluation within the framework of Total Quality Management (TQM) principles (or “Total Quality Service” (TQS) as it was called when promoted and implemented by the community-technical college system.  

 

There are system-wide strategic goals for the twelve Connecticut community colleges that are established for a two to five year period.  QVCC planning follows an annual cycle and college goals are updated each fall after review of the system goals.  Divisional strategies are then adopted that support the college goals.  Budgeting is linked to the college goals. 

 

Individual faculty and staff establish annual goals as well, consistent with the goals of their particular division.  Each person then produces a year-end report that describes how her/his goals have been met and how those goals contributed to the broader divisional and institutional goals.  This report is part of the individual’s evaluation.  The President and other senior administrators lead this process and a system-wide process of evaluation is used to include their performance in the planning and evaluation cycle.

 

In addition to this broadly based planning system, several other more focused planning systems are in place.  In compliance with state requirements, the College annually develops an Affirmative Action Plan.  The College also has a Facilities Master Plan and a Faculty Development and Review Plan. 

 

The college planning processes are data driven, as are a broad variety of evaluation tools with which the results of planning are assessed.  Information from graduate evaluation surveys, employer surveys and the five-year cycle for academic program review are all used to develop the goals established by the Lead Planning Team, divisions and individuals.  Progress toward goal attainment is reported to the college community at monthly staff meetings.  Programmatic self-studies and a system of discipline review are used to continually re-examine and improve the curriculum.

 

The college received the Connecticut Award for Excellence at the Nutmeg level partially based on the strength of the institution’s operational planning.  QVCC is the only higher education institution to be granted this recognition.  .

 

As a TQM institution, QVCC uses Process Improvement Teams (PIT’s) whenever a need is identified to improve specific problems.  For example, PIT’s have been formed to improve course scheduling, streamline disbursement of financial aid awards, one stop registration, advisement, policies related to students with disabilities and library services for the Willimantic campus.

 

Strengths

 

  1. Planning and goal setting are pervasive throughout the institution and are one of the outstanding strengths of the college.

 

  1. Goals are set for the college as a whole (based on system goals), then by each division and finally by each individual employee.  Annually, goal attainment is assessed and then new goals are set.

 

 

Concerns

 

  1. The College should continue to implement its plans for evaluating student learning outcomes.

 

  1. The Affirmative Action Plan refers to hiring goals and co-curricular programmatic offerings, which appears to meet state requirements for the Affirmative Action Plan, but the College does not appear to have diversity goals related to student enrollment.

 

 

 

Standard Three

 

Organization and Governance
| top of page |

 

Quinebaug Valley Community College is one of 12 institutions governed at the system level by the Connecticut Community-Technical College (CCTC) Board of Trustees under the provisions of Public Act 89-160. The Chancellor oversees the day-to-day operation of the system.   The Council of Presidents and the Council of Chairs advise the Chancellor. 

 

On the institutional level, the President is the chief administrative officer.  All constituencies are advisory to her.  There is a clear understanding of the relationship between the governing board and the institution.  There is also a clearly defined channel of communication between the system and institutional levels, as well as between the President and the various internal constituencies.

 

The 16-member Connecticut Community College Board of Trustees includes 2 students.  The Board has 4 committees: academic policies, budgets and facilities, personnel, and planning and assessment.  This Board appoints local citizens to the Regional Advisory Councils that in turn advise the Board as well their local institutions.

 

There has been an attempt in the system to develop shared governance.  However, a statewide initiative to form a Community College Senate representing all constituencies, full and part-time faculty, professional staff, classified employees and students was chartered in 1998 but has organizational issues and has not been recognized by Board of Trustees.

 

At the institutional level, shared governance is embedded in the college’s organizational structures.  Each division of the College is organized according to its functions.  The merger of the Academic and Student Services divisions into the division of Learning and Student Development has facilitated the college’s new guiding principle of Learners First.   Monthly general staff meetings are central to the advisory role of all the college constituencies. Virtually all matters affecting the institution are discussed at these meetings, which are required for all QVCC staff.  Committee and divisional units review matters before they are brought to the all-staff meeting.

 

The President’s Cabinet is comprised of the Dean of Administrative Services, the Dean of Learning and Student Development, the Director of Continuing Education, and the President’s Executive Assistant.  The Director’s role in the president’s cabinet ensures that off campus continuing education evening and weekend programs are clearly integrated and incorporated into the governance system of the institution.

 

Faculty assure the academic integrity of the institution’s educational programs by participation in a series of committees designed to move issues and concerns through the institutional governance structures towards resolution.  The Learning and Student Development Division has an elected Division Council with two committees.  The Academic Issues Committee is responsible for making recommendations regarding courses, programs, and distinctly academic issues.  A second committee, the Division Planning and Policy Committee makes recommendations regarding divisional issues not specific to academic matters and curricula.  Committees, either standing committees or task groups with appointed or elected members, carry out much of the work of the college.  Voluntary ad hoc committees are created when a need is seen.  The Total Quality Steering Committee oversees the work of voluntary short-term task groups called Process Improvement Teams.  All committees report back to the general staff meetings. Committees are assessed annually. Included in committee assessments are recommendations for the coming year.

 

Students are provided a voice in QVCC’s organization and governance at the system and College levels. Student representatives serve at the system level as members of the Board of Trustees. At the local level the Student Government Association is also an advisory body.  There is a seat on the Division Council reserved for a student elected for the SGA although it is difficult to get students to serve on college committees. Students from both campuses participate in the organization.  Meetings are held using the compressed video system so students at both campuses can attend, although the degree of visibility of student government at the Willimantic campus is variable from year to year, depending upon the particular students elected to office and their connections to the Willimantic campus or willingness to spend time there.

 

Strengths

 

1.      QVCC is an institution that values opinions from all segments and facilitates the participation of all constituencies in the governance process. Everyone has a voice, can raise a concern and propose an idea.

 

2.      Assessment is built into the governance structure to ensure that committees are productive.

 

3.      The governance of the college provides for student participation in College committees and other governance groups.

 

4.      The all-staff monthly meetings serve an important informational and community purpose.

 

Concerns

 

1.      There is a need to find ways to encourage more student participation on committees.  This would provide the institution with another perspective and the students with more insight into the governance of the college.

 

2.      The number of direct reporting relationships for some managers creates a substantial challenge for management effectiveness.

 

Advice

 

·        Given the size of the institution and the workload of committees and other components of the governance system, consideration might be given to streamlining the multiple layers of the governance system.  There may be too many committees for the number of full-time faculty and staff.

 

·        To facilitate student participation in college governance, the Student Government Association should strive for equitable visibility on both campuses.

 

 

 

Standard Four

 

Programs and Instruction
| top of page |

 

Quinebaug Valley Community College’s (QVCC) primary focus is the education of its students. This focus is displayed through a “learners first” attitude which pervades the entire institution.  Programs are offered at the associate and certificate levels and include an associate’s program in General Studies.  All of the associate degree programs include courses that progress from basic to advanced. Some of the advanced courses are not offered at QVCC, but are offered collaboratively at sister community colleges.

 

Programs are consistent and serve the mission of the college.  The career programs all have Advisory Committees that provide feedback to the program coordinators about student performance, appropriateness of the curricula, and student preparation for employment.  Although laboratory space is limited, the labs are fairly well equipped and the faculty makes good use of the available space and equipment.

 

Each program has clearly defined student outcomes and learning objectives that are compiled in the Learning Outcomes Assessment Record.  This document outlines linkages between intended program outcomes and program requirements with a curriculum map for each program.  It also lists the assessment processes that are employed to assess the program outcomes in each course.

 

QVCC has a clearly defined academic planning and evaluation process for all academic programs.  The College is implementing a new five-year program review cycle for each program that will include the results from the Learning Outcomes Assessment Record.  The Lead Planning Team (the President, Learning and Student Development Dean and representatives of major offices on campus) establishes a set of goals and objectives for the institution.  Each division then prepares a set of objectives and goals for the year that are supportive of the institution’s goal.  Each department or program in the division then prepares its report.  The Lead Planning Team regularly monitors activities and progress is reported back to Faculty and Staff at the monthly staff meetings.  A final report on the attainment of the goals is prepared in April and is related (or will be related) to the program reviews and the Learning Outcomes Assessment Record.  A new set of revised goals and objectives are then prepared for the next year.

 

There are no programs slated for discontinuance at this time.  The college makes every effort to ensure that students who enroll in a program will have an opportunity to graduate from that program.  If it were to be discontinued, or if a course necessary for graduation could not be offered because of low enrollments, appropriate courses may be substituted or Tutorials (directed studies) would be offered.

 

The Center for Community and Professional Learning (CPL) is responsible for the administration of credit offerings on weekends and summer and for non-credit offerings to businesses and the community. All offerings are consistent with courses and programs offered during the regular semester and are offered in consultation with the appropriate faculty.  The CPL offerings are supported by the administration and have adequate resources to maintain quality. The CPL is also responsible developing, scheduling, and administering conferences and other instructional or enrichment activities.

 

Undergraduate Degree Programs

 

Although the college is small and has few full-time faculty, an amazing variety of courses are offered.  This is achieved primarily through the liberal use of adjunct faculty, innovative teaching, multi-discipline instructors, and use of technology.  The wide variety of courses available to the student allows for in-depth study in the major and the opportunity to take interesting electives.  All programs have the proper requirements for general education.  The general education requirements are reasonable and balanced to provide a good foundation for an educated person.

 

In addition to the general education requirements and the Learning Outcomes Assessment Record, every student must write a ten-page research paper in order to graduate.  The research paper is evaluated using a rubric for content, writing and information literacy.

 

Scholarship And Research

 

The scholarship and research conducted by the QVCC Faculty focuses primarily on student learning and pedagogy.  The college provides support for these activities in several ways.  Depending on the availability of resources, supplies, computers, support personnel, funds for professional development, release time and sabbaticals are used to encourage scholarship and research. 

 

Contract funds are available for professional development averaging approximately five hundred dollars per award.  Applications are made to the Sabbatical Leave and Professional Development Committee with recommendations then made to the President for funding.  The college has a decentralized budgeting process, so each faculty member has a set budget to manage for such things as supplies, copying, speakers, trips, etc.

 

Instruction

 

Instructional techniques and delivery systems are appropriate and compatible with the mission and purposes of the institution.  The faculty have embraced and adapted for their needs many new technological and innovative methods of instruction including modular courses, web based instruction, compressed video and web-based instruction using a portable cart with twenty-four wireless computers.  The institution has encouraged these endeavors and supported them financially whenever possible.

 

The college has 1,455 students and 21 full-time faculty who act as advisors.  Professional staff and the Dean also advise students, but the load per advisor is quite large, a continuing challenge for the college. 

 

In an effort to improve advising, the college sets aside two days each semester for registration when all faculty and staff are available for advising.   It is difficult for all faculty and staff to be sufficiently familiar with all of the programs at the college to effectively advise every student although the advisement and transfer manual should be very helpful.  Also, the two days only address registration and not all of the other advisor functions.

 

Admissions And Retention

 

The college’s admission policy is clearly stated in the catalog.  All students are required to take placement exams in reading, writing and mathematics.  Students who do not score at college level are required to take the appropriate developmental courses.  The College collects data that show most students who successfully complete developmental courses are successful in subsequent college courses.

 

The college has clear policies for awarding transfer and experiential learning credits.  These policies are consistent with the academic level and quality of programs at QVCC.  A student who wishes to be granted experiential credits must take a course on portfolio presentation that teaches the student how to present his case for the award of credit in the most effective way.

 

 

 

Strengths

 

  1. The “Learners First” philosophy is evident throughout the institution.

 

  1. Resources are allocated on the basis of program goals and a discipline review process that uses periodic programmatic self-studies.

 

  1. Instruction is highly innovative and makes excellent use of technology and available resources.

 

  1. A research paper required of all students is one of the measures used for assessment of student learning.

 

  1. The institution uses a highly structured and rigorous method of assessing prior life and work experience for credit.

 

Concerns

 

  1. Resources and staffing are barely adequate to meet programmatic needs and related services.

 

  1. The number of students in relation to faculty and staff advisors places extraordinary and sometimes inequitable caseloads on advisors.

 

 

 

Standard Five

 

Faculty
| top of page |

 

The QVCC faculty qualifications and performance are sufficient to accomplish the mission of the college and both the preparation and qualifications of faculty are suited to the field and level of faculty assignments.  The faculty is particularly committed to continual self-examination, purposeful change and innovation as demonstrated by the individual action plans that address faculty fulfillment of the institutional goals and their own professional development planning and implementation.  The institution is quite clearly a source of pride for students and the community reflecting the high quality of education and the climate of intellectual enrichment provided by faculty.  Faculty live by the “Learners First” principle adopted several years ago by the college community as evidenced by the learner centered focus in classroom instruction and curricular development.  QVCC is one of only 61 colleges nationally recognized by the League for Innovation as a Learning Champion that formally designated the QVCC faculty as committed to learners and professional development.

 

The number of full-time faculty may not be sufficient to carry out functions beyond teaching such as student advisement, academic planning, participation in policy making, course and curricular development and college governance.  The faculty appears to face major challenges to carry out their commitment to adequate instructional planning as they strive to serve on numerous committees and handle large numbers of student advisees. A review of “Faculty Additional Responsibilities Forms” reveals an enormous amount of scholarly and research activity, community service and liaison activity and other responsibilities that enhance the progress and reputation of the college but extend the workload of the faculty.  The faculty are dedicated to wearing many hats and serving in multiple roles, but as the college strives to meet community needs through the development of additional program and course offerings, the ability of 21 faculty to handle those growing academic planning demands will further tax the human resources of the College.

 

There is a high dependence on adjunct faculty who currently are responsible for 56% of course sections.  While the college has been able to retain many adjuncts over a long period of time, the applicant pool in this region is not sufficient to support diversified course offering.  The reliance on adjuncts to support more than half of the curricular offerings impacts the availability of faculty support to students and places a large burden on the already taxed full-time faculty who are responsible for selection and evaluation of adjuncts.

 

The institution maintains printed guidelines pertinent to the faculty selection process via the publication “Guidelines for Recruitment, Selection and Hiring of Personnel”.  Faculty members are actively involved in search committee processes and national searches attempt to attract candidates who will bring diversity of background to the campus.  For the small size of the college, the selection process has managed to bring a adequate range of faculty diversity to the campus.

 

The collective bargaining agreement between the CCTC Board of Trustees and the Congress of Connecticut Community Colleges outlines extensively all contractual aspects of faculty employment such as appointment, evaluation, workload, promotion, grievances and other pertinent working condition issues.  Salary and benefits for both full-time and adjunct faculty are competitive and even exceed those of neighboring states, thus aiding in the recruitment and retention of qualified faculty.

 

The college has policies governing the role of adjunct faculty.  It maintains a comprehensive adjunct faculty handbook that covers a wide range of topics to assist the adjuncts in learning about the college policies and procedures as well as helping them develop effective teaching strategies, course objectives and course documents.  Adjunct faculty members are each assigned a full-time faculty liaison to aid in their orientation to QVCC.    Policies for full-time faculty are clearly delineated in the Learning and Student Development Division Handbook that is also available via the college web site.

 

There is an effective procedure utilized by the Connecticut Community Technical College (CCTC) system for faculty evaluation that is based upon classroom observations and student evaluation as well as self-appraisal.  The evaluation philosophy addresses both evaluation and development of teaching performance.  At QVCC, the evaluation process supports and is an extension of the “Learners First” philosophy of the college.

 

Professional development support is clearly visible throughout the campus.  Using a combination of union and system funds, the college has been able to nearly double its financial support for professional development activity over the past couple of years.  An active professional development committee meets throughout the year to recommend faculty requests to the president.  The committee has surveyed faculty to assess how processes related to application and awarding of funding can be improved and used the feedback to modify procedures.

 

A full-time faculty member is given a release time to serve as the Teaching and Learning Consultant.  This individual has the willingness and the skill to assist colleagues in addressing professional development needs and there is evidence that faculty are availing themselves of this service.  Additionally the statewide Center for Teaching Excellence (CFTE) has awarded money to individuals who wish to pursue CFTE initiated projects. The CCTC system offers free professional development workshops throughout the year on system-wide basis and supports an annual statewide seminar run by faculty for faculty that is open to both full-time and adjunct faculty. 

 

The college Foundation has been supportive of college-wide professional development initiatives also.  Faculty Development and Review Plans are created when a faculty member is evaluated.  Additional Responsibilities, which equate to 20% of load or 9 hours per week, are developed annually.  These relate to division, college and system goals and may list objectives for professional development.  As this system evolves, greater need for professional development funds may occur.

 

Faculty members made a commitment to the innovative use of instructional technology and have placed QVCC at the forefront of web-based instructional support, distance learning and computer technology to support classroom instruction.  The college shares an instructional technology specialist with two other colleges.  This individual is highly committed to supporting faculty in their instructional endeavors and is in high demand by the QVCC faculty.  Based upon usage of the specialist’s services, it appears that the college could use and benefit from an additional time commitment by this individual. 

 

Strengths

 

  1. The full-time faculty, and to some extent the part-time faculty, participate in a wide variety of roles across the institution without regard to technical contractual specifics.

 

  1. With limited resources the institution supports creative professional development through its committee structure and